Volume 3, Issue 2 p. 448-454
CLINICAL PHARMACY RESEARCH REPORT

Development of the comprehensive medication management practice management assessment tool: A resource to assess and prioritize areas for practice improvement

Deborah L. Pestka Pharm.D., Ph.D.

Corresponding Author

Deborah L. Pestka Pharm.D., Ph.D.

Department of Pharmaceutical Care and Health Systems, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota

Correspondence

Deborah Pestka, Pharmaceutical Care and Health Systems, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, 7-191 Weaver-Densford Hall, 308 Harvard Street S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Caitlin K. Frail Pharm.D., M.S.

Caitlin K. Frail Pharm.D., M.S.

Department of Pharmaceutical Care and Health Systems, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota

Search for more papers by this author
Lindsay A. Sorge Pharm.D., MPH

Lindsay A. Sorge Pharm.D., MPH

Department of Pharmaceutical Care and Health Systems, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota

Search for more papers by this author
Kylee A. Funk Pharm.D.

Kylee A. Funk Pharm.D.

Department of Pharmaceutical Care and Health Systems, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota

Search for more papers by this author
Kristin K. Janke Ph.D.

Kristin K. Janke Ph.D.

Department of Pharmaceutical Care and Health Systems, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota

Search for more papers by this author
Mary T. Roth McClurg Pharm.D., MHS, FCCP

Mary T. Roth McClurg Pharm.D., MHS, FCCP

Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Todd D. Sorensen Pharm.D., FCCP

Todd D. Sorensen Pharm.D., FCCP

Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 October 2019
Citations: 16
Funding information American College of Clinical Pharmacy Research Institute

Abstract

Background

Significant attention has been given to developing a consistent patient care process for providing comprehensive medication management (CMM). However, little research exists that examines the structures required to effectively manage a CMM practice to achieve quality, consistency and sustainability.

Objective

The objective of this research was to create a CMM practice management assessment tool to identify and prioritize areas of CMM practice improvement.

Methods

Thirty-four pharmacists providing CMM from 35 primary care clinics across five states were divided into three cohorts. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with pharmacists from Cohort 1. Participants were asked to describe the essential components of CMM practice management and to detail the characteristics of these components in their practice. Themes were identified by two investigators and a descriptive practice assessment tool was developed from emergent themes. Using cognitive interviewing, participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 completed sections of the tool while verbalizing their thought process and providing feedback. This process led to simultaneous development and refinement of the tool, as well as developing evidence of content validity. Throughout tool development, a series of four focus groups with managers overseeing pharmacists providing CMM occurred to obtain their perspectives and feedback on the tool.

Results

A tool with five domains was developed. Each domain consists of two to three essential components of CMM practice management for a total of 13 components. Each component contains several questions which collectively form a 78-item descriptive practice management assessment tool.

Conclusion

A descriptive practice management assessment tool was developed that can be used to aid in CMM practice advancement. This tool can provide direction for quality improvement work as pharmacists and managers seek to make their practices more efficient and sustainable.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.